|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Signed up: |
4 years ago (4/22/09)
|
|
|
Last signed in:
|
1 week ago
|
| |
|
|
|
Block |
|
|
|
|
|
| woolyrivit |
 | Sponsor |
|
|
|
|
|
Call of Duty 4So I dusted off my copy of cod4 and played some of the online matchmaking for the first time in nearly two years. After getting sucked in and playing for a few hours I've come to the conclusion that no other call of duty game even comes close to having such a solid multiplayer experience (despite the fact that everyone that still plays it is trying to be a sniping god and failing). It's really hard to understand why that is because in theory mw2 should be better because of all the new features (I'm not even going to mention Black Ops broken multiplayer... and mentioning it in brackets totally doesn't count).
But I honestly believe one of the main reasons is the maps. In cod4 the maps are much smaller on average but that makes for a much faster paced game and it's much easier to feel the tide of battle shifting. I believe the change from halo 3 to halo: reach suffers from this as well. Halo Reach is great but I find many of the maps to big to have a decently paced game. Also the simplicity of cod4's system compared to it's successors really makes the experience more immersive. But I probably have to take nostalgia into consideration because cod 4 and halo 3 were the first two shooters I ever played (yes I know I got into shooters late but at least I started at 16 as opposed to 8 which seems to be the average age to start nowadays).
But all that considered I still believe none of the current or next call of duty games will live up to cod 4 and I'm one more Black Opsesc (It's in the dictionary I swear) Call of Duty game away from giving up on the franchise altogether.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Watch
Add Friend
Invite to Group
